{
  "WorkItem": {
    "AffectedComponent": {
      "Name": "",
      "DisplayName": ""
    },
    "ClosedComment": "",
    "ClosedDate": null,
    "CommentCount": 0,
    "Custom": null,
    "Description": "from http://dotnetzip.codeplex.com/discussions/268593 \n \nPeople have \"claimed\" there \"should\" be no difference between a CLR2 assembly and a CLR4 assembly, and there may not be any on small applications. \n \nHowever, we have noticed a perf difference with our .Net 2 stuff as we are migrating to .Net 4 and because of the performance and compatibility issues we had running CLR2 stuff under CLR4.  \n \nWe however are not a small little app, we have a enterprise class application. We decided to force a migration of everything we have in our next major release to be .Net 4 period instead of just a few parts.  This increased or work load and will most likely effect our release date, but it had to be done to deal with the issue.  I looked and I couldn't find anything about others talking about this issue public but I have seen it with my own eyes. So there may not be many private company going out and talking about it for .Net Enterprise applications.\n \nAlso in my testing CLR4 apps seem to have better memory usage and a smaller memory footprint simply by switching from CLR2 or CLR4 with no code changes.\n \nTime to make the jump.",
    "LastUpdatedDate": "2014-03-14T08:21:29.627-07:00",
    "PlannedForRelease": "",
    "ReleaseVisibleToPublic": false,
    "Priority": {
      "Name": "Low",
      "Severity": 50,
      "Id": 1
    },
    "ProjectName": "DotNetZip",
    "ReportedDate": "2011-08-11T09:49:36.707-07:00",
    "Status": {
      "Name": "Proposed",
      "Id": 1
    },
    "ReasonClosed": {
      "Name": "Unassigned"
    },
    "Summary": "Produce a version of the library compiled to .Net 4.0",
    "Type": {
      "Name": "Issue",
      "Id": 3
    },
    "VoteCount": 5,
    "Id": 14068
  },
  "FileAttachments": [],
  "Comments": [
    {
      "Message": "Looking forward to that release.",
      "PostedDate": "2011-08-12T07:54:26.397-07:00",
      "Id": -2147483648
    },
    {
      "Message": "",
      "PostedDate": "2011-12-14T00:46:20.88-08:00",
      "Id": -2147483648
    },
    {
      "Message": "",
      "PostedDate": "2013-02-21T18:43:05.42-08:00",
      "Id": -2147483648
    },
    {
      "Message": "",
      "PostedDate": "2013-05-28T02:32:31.123-07:00",
      "Id": -2147483648
    },
    {
      "Message": "",
      "PostedDate": "2014-03-14T08:21:29.627-07:00",
      "Id": -2147483648
    }
  ]
}