{
  "WorkItem": {
    "AffectedComponent": {
      "Name": "",
      "DisplayName": ""
    },
    "ClosedComment": "",
    "ClosedDate": null,
    "CommentCount": 0,
    "Custom": null,
    "Description": "The Ms-Pl is incompatible with many free software licenses, as it imposes a unique restriction:\n\n\n> (D) If you distribute any portion of the software in source code form, you may do so **only under this license** by including a complete copy of this license with your distribution. [...]\n\n\nMany OSI-approved copyleft licenses require that linking or interacting code must be licensed in a manner that does not further restrict user rights. This conflicts with the Ms-Pl, as it specifically prohibits the right to re-license.\n\nThere are many GPL, LGPL, and AGPL-licensed libraries, yet we cannot legally combine these with DotNetZip due to the terms of the Ms-Pl. \n\nDual-licensing under Apache 2 or MIT would resolve the problem. \n\nThoughts?",
    "LastUpdatedDate": "2014-11-24T11:12:04.187-08:00",
    "PlannedForRelease": "",
    "ReleaseVisibleToPublic": false,
    "Priority": {
      "Name": "Unassigned",
      "Severity": 0,
      "Id": 0
    },
    "ProjectName": "DotNetZip",
    "ReportedDate": "2014-11-24T11:12:04.187-08:00",
    "Status": {
      "Name": "Proposed",
      "Id": 1
    },
    "ReasonClosed": {
      "Name": "Unassigned"
    },
    "Summary": "Consider dual-licensing under Apache 2?",
    "Type": {
      "Name": "Unassigned",
      "Id": 5
    },
    "VoteCount": 1,
    "Id": 17160
  },
  "FileAttachments": [],
  "Comments": []
}